Statistical Consultants Ltd



HomeServicesBlogLinksAboutContact


Axiomatic Analysis of Elementary Indices



Economics, Economic / Financial Data



Before reading this feature, it may help if you first read: Elementary Indices.
 
Elementary index calculation methods can be tested against various axioms, to investigate whether or not they have certain desirable properties.
 
Some axioms are more important than others.


Axioms


For each of the following axioms:
n is the sample size of the good being surveyed
pt are the prices of the good at the current period
p0 are the prices of the good at the base period
P is the elementary price index and is a function of the current and base period prices


Continuity

Pp0pt  is a continuous function of n positive base period prices and n positive current period prices.


Identity

The index at the base period equals one. 

identity1


Monotonicity in Current Period Prices

monotonicity in current period prices if pA LT pB


Monotonicity in Base Period Prices

monotonicity in base period prices if pA LT pB


Proportionality in Current Period Prices

proportionality in current period prices if lambda GT 0


Inverse Proportionality in Base Period Prices

Inverse proportionality in base period prices if lambda GT 0


Mean Value Test

The price index lies between the smallest and biggest price ratios.

mean value test


Symmetric Treatment of Establishment / Products

If there is a change in the ordering of establishments (or products within an establishment) the price quotations are obtained from for the two periods, the elementary index remains unchanged.

symmetric treatment where p0* and pt* denote the same permutation of the components of p0 and pt.


Price-Bouncing Test

A more generalised (and more controversial) version of the previous axiom, the price-bouncing test allows for different permutations between the base and current periods.

price bouncing test where p0* and pt** denote possibly different permutations of the components of p0and pt.


Time Reversal

time reversal


Circularity

circularity

 

Commensurability

The units of measurement for each product have no effect on the price index.

commensurability



How the elementary indices compare

 
Dutot Jevons Carli Harmonic
Mean
of
Price
Relatives
Carruthers/
Sellwood/
Ward/
Dalén
Ratio of
Harmonic Means

Continuity

Y Y Y Y Y Y

Identity

Y Y Y Y Y Y

Monotonicity in Current Period Prices

Y Y Y Y Y Y

Monotonicity in Base Period Prices

Y Y Y Y Y Y

Proportionality in Current Period Prices

Y Y Y Y Y Y

Inverse Proportionality in Base Period Prices

Y Y Y Y Y Y

Mean Value Test

Y Y Y Y Y Y

Symmetric Treatment of Establishment / Products

Y Y Y Y Y Y

Price-Bouncing Test

Y Y N N N Y

Time Reversal

Y Y N N Y Y

Circularity

Y Y N N N Y

Commensurability

N Y Y Y Y N
 

Jevons index satisfies all of the axioms described here.  In some countries (including USA and New Zealand), Jevons index has been used more in recent years, replacing the Dutot index at least for some categories.
 
A problem with the Dutot index (and ratio of harmonic means) is that it doesn’t satisfy the commensurability axiom.  This means that if the units of measurement change for a product, it would affect the price index.  For some products, this won’t be a problem. 
 
The Carli index and the harmonic mean of price relatives don’t satisfy the price bouncing test, time reversal or circularity.  The inability for time reversal is the biggest of these problems, but can be solved by taking the geometric mean of the two indices i.e. by using a Carruthers / Sellwood / Ward / Dalén index.  The inability for time reversal has meant the Carli index is upwardly biased, and the harmonic mean of price relatives is downwardly biased.


See also:

Elementary Indices
Different ways of measuring the Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Index Numbers





HomeServicesBlogLinksAboutContact

Copyright © Statistical Consultants Ltd  2011